Cash Ball
Cash4Life® - Play And Check Winning Numbers | Virginia Lottery
Players pick five white ball numbers from 1 through 60 in the main field, plus one number from 1 through 4 from the second field, the green “Cash Ball”. No deposit rewards. Players also have the option to have the terminal randomly select the numbers in both fields. Cash Ball 225; Lucky for Life; All Online Games; Draw Games Powerball; Mega Millions; Keno; CASH POP; Fast Play; Win Place Show; Lucky for Life; Cash Ball 225; Pick 3; Pick 4; 5 Card Cash; All Draw Games; Winning Numbers; Watch the Drawings; Scratch-offs Instant Play. The Cash features a newly designed asymmetric core and a highly aggressive reactive cover formulation that combined result in the most aggressive, biggest hooking Radical ball to date. That’s rightwe made an even stronger ball that we believe will set a new standard for total. Read more Find a Pro Shop Watch the Cash in Action. Pick five different numbers from 1 through 60; then select one Cash Ball number from 1 through 4. You also can select Easy Pick and let the computer choose your numbers. Or use a combination of the play methods above — pick some of your favorite numbers, and let the computer fill in the rest. Cash4Life® drawings are held every day at 9 p.m.
Cash Ball Kentucky Lottery
- Argyris. C (1980) “Some Inner Contradictions in Management Information Systems” In H C Lucas, et al. (Eds.) The Information Systems Environment, Amsterdam: North-Holland. Reproduced in R D Galliers (Ed.) (1987a), op cit., pp. 99–111.Google Scholar
- Cash, Jr., J I (1985) “Interorganizational Systems: An Information Society Opportunity or Threat?” The Information Society, 3(3). Reproduced in Somogyi & Galliers (1987), op cit., pp. 200–220.Google Scholar
- Checkland, P B (1972) “Towards a Systems-Based Methodology for Real-World Problem-Solving” Journal of Systems Engineering, 3(2).Google Scholar
- Checkland, P (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Checkland, P & Scholes, J (1990) Soft Systems Methodology in Action Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Checkland, P B & Wilson, B (1980) “Primary Task and Issue-Based Root Definitions in Systems Studies” Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 7.Google Scholar
- Feldman, M S & March, J G (1981) “Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol” Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), June, pp. 171–186. Reproduced in R D Galliers (Ed.) (1987a), op cit., pp. 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Galliers, R D (1984) “An Approach to Information Analysis” Proceedings of the First IFIP International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, London, 4–7 September. Reproduced in B Shackel (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction — INTERACT ′84, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1985. Also in R D Galliers (Ed.) (1987a) op cit., pp. 291–304.Google Scholar
- Galliers, R D (1985) “Providing a Coherent Information Planning Environment to Meet Changing Organisational and Individual Information Needs” WAIT Computing and Quantitative Studies Working Paper, Perth, Western Australia, January.Google Scholar
- Galliers, R D (Ed.) (1987a) Information Analysis: Selected Readings Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Galliers, R D (1987b) “Applied Research in Information Systems Planning” Proceedings: Database ′87, Annual Conference of the British Computer Society Database Specialist Group, Edinburgh, April.Google Scholar
- Galliers, R D (1987c) “Information Systems Planning in Britain and Australia in the Mid-1980s: Key Success Factors”, Unpublished PhD Thesis, London School of Economics, June.Google Scholar
- Galliers, R D (1991) “Strategic Information Systems Planning: Myths, Reality and Guidelines for Successful Implementation” European Journal of Information Systems, 1(1), January, pp.55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Galliers, R D, Klass, D J, Levy, M & Pattison E M (1991) “Effective Strategy Formulation Using Decision Conferencing and Soft Systems Methodology” In P Kerola, R Lee, K Lyytinen & R Stamper (Eds.) Collaborative Work, Social Communications and Information Systems, Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 Conference, Helsinki, Finland, 27–29 August, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV.Google Scholar
- Galliers, R D, Marshall, P H, Pervan, G P & Klass, D J (1988) “DSS Development within an Information Systems Planning Framework”, DSS-88 Transactions, Eighth International Conference on Decision Support Systems, Boston, MA. 6–9 June, pp. 85–94. To appear in P Gray (Ed.), Readings in Decision Support and Executive Information Systems Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1991.Google Scholar
- Hedberg, B & Jönsson, S (1978) “Designing Semi-Confusing Information Systems for Organizations in Changing Environments” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 3(1), pp. 47–64. Reproduced in R D Galliers (Ed.) (1987a), op cit., pp. 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Land, F F (1982) “Adapting to Changing User Requirements” Information and Management, 5, pp. 59–75. Reproduced in R D Galliers (Ed.) (1987a), op cit., pp. 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Land, F F & Kennedy-McGregor, M (1981) “Effective Use of Internal Information” Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Information Systems Teaching (FEWIST), Aix-en-Provence, April. Reproduced under the title “Information and Information Systems: Concepts and Perspectives” in R D Galliers (Ed.) (1987a), op cit., pp. 63–91.Google Scholar
- LeFevre, A M & Pattison, E M (1986) “Planning for Hospital Information Systems Using the Lancaster Soft Systems Methodology” Australian Computer Journal, 18(4), November, pp. 180–185.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, T J (1980) “Information Systems Constraints — A Strategic Review”. In S H Lavington (Ed.) Information Processing 80, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
- Mittermeir, R T, Hsia, P & Yeh, R T (1982) “Alternatives to Overcome the Communication Problem of Formal Requirements Analysis” In Ohno (Ed.) Requirements Engineering Environments, Amsterdam: North-Holland. Reproduced in R D Galliers (Ed.) (1987a), op cit., pp. 153–165.Google Scholar
- Morien, R I, Galliers, R D, Marshall, P H & Pattison, E M (1988) “Corporate Planning, Information Systems Planning and Performance Evaluation” Fifth National Evaluation Conference, Australian Evaluation Society, Melbourne, 27–29 July.Google Scholar
- Nolan, R (1979) “Managing the Crises in Data Processing” Harvard Business Review, 57(2), March–April.Google Scholar
- Oliver, I & Langford, H (1984) “Myths of Demons and Users” Proceedings of the Australian Computer Conference, Australian Computer Society Inc., Sydney, Australia, November. Reproduced in R D Galliers (Ed.) (1987a), op cit., pp. 113–123.Google Scholar
- Porter, M E (1980) Competitive Strategy New York: The Free PressGoogle Scholar
- Porter, M E (1985) Competitive Advantage New York: The Free PressGoogle Scholar
- Rockart, J F (1979) “Chief Executives Define Their Own Data Needs” Harvard Business Review, 57(2), March–April. Reproduced in R D Galliers (Ed.) (1987a), op cit., pp. 267–289.Google Scholar
- Somogyi, E K & Galliers, R D (1987) Towards Strategic Information Systems Tunbridge Wells: Abacus Press.Google Scholar
- Watson, R & Smith, R (1988) “Applications of the Lancaster Soft Systems Methodology in Australia” Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 15, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
- Wilson, B (1980) “The Maltese Cross — A Tool for Information Systems Analysis and Design” Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 7.Google Scholar
- Wilson, B (1984) Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Wilson, B (1990) Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications (Second Edition) Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Valusek, J R & Fryback, D G (1985) “Information Requirements Determination: Obstacles Within, Among and Between Participants” Proceedings of the End-User Computing Conference, Association of Computing Machinery Inc., Minnesota. Reproduced in R D Galliers (Ed.) (1987a), op cit., pp. 139–151.Google Scholar
- Yadav, S B (1983) “Determining an Organization’s Information Requirements” Data Base, 14(3), Spring.Google Scholar